Was UW’s Latest Tuition Hike Justified? The Answer is Complicated.
UW-Madison provides a world-class education, so it is not unreasonable to charge a premium for it. At the same time, the university must make cost-saving decisions when possible.
Tuition at the University of Wisconsin-Madison has been increased for the fourth year in a row. While there are legitimate criticisms for how this increase came about, the extra cost may be necessary.
On June 4, the UW System Board of Regents approved a two percent hike in tuition for students in the 2026-27 academic year. This represents a two percent increase for in-state students and a four percent increase for out-of-state students, along with a 2.4 percent increase in the segregated fee rate, according to the UW-Madison Bursar’s Office.
There are good reasons to be concerned about this increase. Tuition has already been raised multiple times in recent years. Just last year, the tuition was increased by five percent.
UW Board of Regents president Amy Bogost has been accused of misleading lawmakers in April about the regents’ consideration of a tuition increase. Less than two months later, she voted to increase it, along with most of the board. After the unceremonious ouster of former UW System president Jay Rothman, this did little to promote public trust in the regents. Kyle M. Weatherly was voted to succeed Bogost in June, but she is still on the board. Regent Timothy Nixon was the lone vote against the increase.
Student debt is higher than ever. More and more graduates are laden with debt that will follow them for decades and keep them from achieving their own goals, starting businesses, raising families, or enjoying a fulfilling life. The people who will suffer the most damage from this are low to middle-income students who don’t qualify for enough aid. These students will be forced to take on more debt and spend more time paying it off and being held back from enjoying the prime of their lives.
It is important to ask where this money will go, as much may very well be wasted on a bloated administration. The students of Wisconsin have a right not to be okay with increased tuition until they can be certain their funds are going to programs and infrastructure that will benefit them. In the past decade, the UW System has lost about 16,000 students. However, it has gained more than 2,000 non-faculty staff members. According to an estimate from State Senator Eric Wimberger, $750 million could be saved by cutting back on administrative bloat. While not every new position necessarily should be removed, a university losing students should not endlessly expand its bureaucracy.
While these legitimate concerns should not be ignored, the decision to increase tuition was not made lightly.
UW-Madison’s tuition is low compared to many peer institutions, according to a report from the Center for Research on the Wisconsin Economy. Despite scoring high in most college rankings, its tuition is in the bottom third of public members of the Association of American Universities.
Compared with many other states and schools, UW-Madison remains relatively affordable and offers an excellent return on investment.
The UW System employs over 41,000 people, and the fact is prices are rising: the cost of living grows every month, and more people than ever are struggling to pay the bills. It would seem fair to ensure that the hardworking faculty and staff of the UW System can continue to afford to live and provide their valuable services, knowledge, expertise, and all other facets of work that keep the UW System strong and provide world-class education to the people of Wisconsin.
Another important thing to consider regarding rising prices is the growing struggle of working-class families and lower-income households to send their children to a good university. Wisconsin ranks near the bottom of states in public funding for universities, so the tuition increase can be used to subsidize low-income students. This moves the burden of funding away from the lower-income households and onto richer native and out-of-state students.
With the recent uncertainties about federal funding, universities may need to find new funding sources for existing programs and infrastructure. Raising tuition, at least until conditions are clearer, would allow the UW System not only to preserve current initiatives but also to reduce its reliance on federal funds. Keeping big institutions running is not a cheap endeavor.
Higher education will become increasingly competitive as the college-age population continues to shrink for the foreseeable future. Universities form the building blocks of many important industries and drive innovation and growth across the public and private sectors. It is in Wisconsin’s best interest to continue attracting world-class students to its universities. There are great opportunities and incentives to increase the prestige and quality of Wisconsin universities to continue reaping their economic benefits and keep the UW System competitive with its peers. This effort will require large and long-term investments.
UW-Madison provides a world-class education, so it is not unreasonable to charge a premium for it. At the same time, the university must make cost-saving decisions when possible. Administrative bloat is one of the more serious – and solvable – problems it faces. While this tuition hike may be justified, the university should not rely on continued increases to fund an inefficient bureaucracy, and the Board of Regents must become more transparent.
 | A guest post by
|